Discussion: “What’s up with Politics?”
Please complete the following as preparation for this discussion. Bring your preparation handwritten or typed/printed to class.
Materials
- Watch this TED Talk by Simon Anholt, “Who Would the Rest of the World Vote for in Your Country’s Election?”
- Review the key vocabulary for the talk.
- Read the Pew Research article about the specific topic you selected in class:
- Find additional news or other credible articles on the specific topic you selected.
Questions
Answer the following questions, and bring your answers typed and printed to class. You can use these questions and any other notes you bring during the discussion.
Whole-class questions
- Anholt claims, “We, all of us, have to understand that thinking inwards is not the solution to the world’s problems. We have to learn how to cooperate and collaborate a great deal more and compete just a tiny bit less. . . if you’re in a position of power and responsibility, you’re responsible for your own people and for every single man, woman, child and animal on the planet.” Do you think Anholt’s idea is possible, or is he optimistic or idealistic? Why?
- In 20 words, summarize Anholt’s “Global Vote” project. Then, in a few sentences, discuss whether or not you think it’s a valid idea. Does this really make elections more “democratic,” as he says?
- What are some of the important political issues in your own country that the rest of the world should be concerned about? What have you noticed about political opinions or attitudes among Americans since living here?
Panel Questions
- Write a short summary (50-100 words) of the main ideas and key points from your selected topic-specific Pew Research article. Be prepared to summarize your article for the class during your group’s panel.
- The article you read focuses on a specific issue in the U.S. that could have implications for other countries. What is your opinion on the issue? What are common opinions on the issue, if any, among people in your country?
Structure
This discussion will follow the panel structure, in which a small group, or “panel,” of about 3-4 people will be “experts” on one of the specific issues. We will begin with a large-class discussion on Anholt’s talk in general, then move into the panels.
Each of these panels will have one of the discussion leaders assigned to lead it. Each panel will come to the front of the room and discuss its specific issue for approximately 6-7 minutes. Then, members in the audience will have 2-3 minutes for questions, before the next panel comes up.